Home

Monday, July 10, 2017

July 9, 2017 Matthew 16.13-20




Now when Jesus came into the district of Caesarea Philippi, 
he asked his disciples, “Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” 
And they said, “Some say John the Baptist, but others Elijah, and still others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” 
He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 
Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.” 
And Jesus answered him, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father in heaven. And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”
 Then he sternly ordered the disciples not to tell anyone that he was the Messiah.

***

Who do you say that Jesus is? 

Awhile ago we were preparing for a church rummage sale, and there was in some church closet, a print of a  famous Warner Sallman painting of Jesus. Jesus’ long dirty blond locks cascaded down a fair-skinned countenance, highlighted by a sharp Greek nose and full pale lips. His beard also was light, and thin like many of the Portland hipsters and young men around Baker today, and in like manner if he entered your house, he probably would look more like our former Youth Director, Luke Rembold than anything unfamiliar. That is to say that Jesus, in this picture was totally white, totally like us. 

And this is what cultures do. They take images of God and make them look like themselves. The Braham of hinduism have dark hair. The Aztec Gods look like tan warriors. The Egyptian hieroglyphics are colored with brown skin, while in the U.S. we have often colored Jesus with the Crayola skin color - nude, which is only our version of nude. This practice of translating the image of God into our own context is what has helped religions spread, and if this is what is happening, I am all for it, but I am afraid, in America our image of Jesus has limited our ability to portray Jesus even our own country’s people, who do not look like that painting, who essentially do not look like us.

A handful of years ago, some forensic anthropologists began to research and study what Jesus would have actually looked like. Most likely, his customary short black hair was coarse and curled, his brows unruly and thick, his eyes one continual black pupil like my hispanic sister where you can’t decipher where pupil starts and where it stops. Jesus’ dark weathered skin and traditional beard would get him stopped at airport security, though his height and weight would have been un-intimidating, closer to the average of the time for a Gallilean Seminte man of five feet one inch and 110 pounds. Not exactly what our Flat Jesus outlines suggest or that Warner Sallman painting. Likewise, one of these forensic anthropologists was riding in a taxi in New York to present on his findings and got into a conversation with middle-eastern immigrant taxi driver. The anthropologist showed the driver the image, and the driver was shocked, “it looks like me,” he said. And through that divine image the taxi driver’s view of Christianity became one that could include him. Here the anthropologist was a disciple saying, this is who Jesus is. 

The location of Caesarea Philippi is similar to how New York City plays in the aforementioned story. It is Caesarea Philippi and therefore Caesar’s city. When Peter names Jesus the Messiah he believes that Jesus will give the Israelites political independence. Peter believes Jesus is anointed for this, like a king to the thrown. Peter believes Jesus will overthrow the Rome, and this is what Peter believes will be the keys to the Kingdom of heaven. Still today, we believe that our country, our race, will end up on top. We have a hard time believing that all of humanity is given the keys. We have a harder time handing out the keys to others who do not look like us, when we imagine Jesus looked like someone we know. How can we hand over the keys to the stranger who is held up in the airport, who is pulled over on the side of the road, who is begging on the street asking for a ride to the Rainbow Festival. We show them that they are a kin to Jesus’ image. 

We did this when we drew the Advent Windows, that hang in our Fellowship Hall at Christmas time. There were a handful of tests to make sure that even with light shining through the transfer paper, that Jesus looked dark, not light. We wanted those with dark skin to be able to say, “it looks like me.” We wanted to remind those of us who prefer the Warner Sallman version, Jesus probably looked more like the immigrant we are not letting into our country. And how might our image of immigrants, of different races, of various religions change, if we knew Jesus looked very dissimilar to your historically white Presbyterian Baker City family? How might the racial makeup of our congregation change if we changed our image of Jesus? When my sister has come to church here, she has noted that she is the only minority in the congregation. Would she feel more included welcome if we depicted Jesus more like her? 

Because of this, and because who we say Jesus is, is important, and foundational, instead putting that painting of white Jesus to sell at the rummage sale, I was walking with it to the trash, when an older congregant stopped me. She wanted to keep it in the church, she wanted to put it up somewhere, and I get this, its nice to think Jesus is like us, but I wonder how thinking Jesus is like us, limits our ability to see he is also like others, limits others ethnicities different that white, to say, “it looks like me.” and so that picture is probably back in some church closet again, until we are ready to throw it away and exchange it for one that looks a little more like a new-yore taxi driver.