Home

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

August 14, 2016 Luke 6:17-26



He came down with them and stood on a level place, 
with a great crowd of his disciples and a great multitude of people from all Judea, Jerusalem, and the coast of Tyre and Sidon. 
They had come to hear him and to be healed of their diseases; 
and those who were troubled with unclean spirits were cured. 
And all in the crowd were trying to touch him, 
for power came out from him and healed all of them. 

Then he looked up at his disciples and said: 
“Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. 
“Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be filled. 
“Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh. 
“Blessed are you when people hate you, and when they exclude you, revile you, and defame you on account of the Son of Man. 
Rejoice in that day and leap for joy, for surely your reward is great in heaven; 
for that is what their ancestors did to the prophets. 
“But woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation. 
“Woe to you who are full now, for you will be hungry. 
“Woe to you who are laughing now, for you will mourn and weep. 
“Woe to you when all speak well of you, 
for that is what their ancestors did to the false prophets. 

***

The young woman stands, leaning to one side, hip jutted out, her thin back to her friend’s phone camera, which pans until we see the young woman also has her phone out, and is watching her video screen. There is part of it that just feels voyeristic rather than fully appreciative, like the point is to capture him, to take the man’s music for herself, to expose to the world the juxtaposition of weathered skin and simple clothes, with the elegance of his song. With the separation of the screen, she has chosen to keep her distance, rather than be in the music with him. Then like a lion in a ring, sizing up its opponent, she walks around him; not something one would do at a concert, but he is not afforded the still silence to which Bach should ensew, his social status as a homeless man trumps his artistry. In the camera lens we watch her detract from his performance as she too is in the limelight of contrast. Her fresh dark curls to his sun-bleached, untrimmed hair and beard, her model thinness to his tanned skin wrapped closely around bones. There is a moment she dances, swaying like kid, the fringe on her purse swings side to side as she smiles and stops again to enjoy, this time without her camera, at least for moment and she is in it without, lost herself in the music like an symphony goer who leans their head back on the edge of the chair closing their eyes and just listens. She moves to his front and side and places her hand on her chin, as if she is realizing there is more than meets the eye. But with that realization comes her need to make it about her, and she begins to video again, as if you can capture a song in snippets, as if you can capture live sound on a phone’s camera. She tells her friend, mid-song, “Do you know how hard this piece is to play,” and when the friend doesn’t hear, she repeats it louder, “Do you know how hard this piece is to play?” There is a way she wants him to be seen, and uses power of her voice to the end, but by speaking she makes her voice drone out his song, distracting the viewer, when perhaps just giving her full attention would have done the same, if not more. 
But there is a way in which his hat on the piano allows it, welcomes it, but keeps the system intact, the one with having power over the one without. Soon in the corner of the camera we see her slide open her black leather wallet and pull out a couple bills, pushing back some more. She unfolds them, inspecting how much to give, all while keeping the decision hidden from him, though not the camera. She says, “This is really cool,” and it feels like justifying herself, as she walks forward to his hat. 
“Its good to see you,” she interrupts as he plays, and over his refined Bach, he responds, with the same casual speech, “it was good to see you too,” and she walks away, a piece of him in her purse, a piece of her purse on his piano. It wasn’t the end he might have been used to whoever it was he learned to play, when the conductor circles and pinches his hands and there is that pause before the clapping starts. We don’t know when it ends, because the camera shuts off, as we assume the friends leave together. 
The video would go viral, without his permission, without his knowing, without his name. The next day the camera holder would go back, find him, video him, while they told him the news. They would ask him about his music background - playing his whole life, and in the marine corp, and all over the world, going to school for music theory, playing everything from the piccolo to the tuba. And still videoing they would ask how long he’d been homeless, and tell him that they hoped someone would find him a job, not in construction for which he said he had skills, but in music, because they saw his gift. But missed the reality of the system, that this mans hands had been worth more in labor than pleasure. But they knew the reality, like woman speaking over his song, that it just might take someone from the outside plucking him out of his poverty, for it to be overcome. Other videos, as he became more famous, show a transformation of his beard being shaved, his hair trimmed, and playing at an NFL game, and I question if this is simply more of the same. An outsider’s camera catching him, and a bigger hat catching the outsider’s purses. It’s the system on a larger scale. 
And my question is, when is he seen as the musician, rather than the homeless musician? When is he seen as Donald Gould? 

“Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. 
“Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be filled. 
“Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh. 
“Blessed are you when people hate you, and when they exclude you, revile you, and defame you on account of the Son of Man. 
Rejoice in that day and leap for joy,
for surely your reward is great in heaven; 
for that is what their ancestors did to the prophets. 
“But woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation. 
“Woe to you who are full now, for you will be hungry. 
“Woe to you who are laughing now, for you will mourn and weep. 
“Woe to you when all speak well of you, 
for that is what their ancestors did to the false prophets.

Watching this video is painful, because I identify with the woman, though I see her missteps, how am I any different, preaching his story, using their video, sharing my voice? Woe, to me, for I already received my consolation, but I cannot see.